Success! The first atomic clocks were built by physicists.
Success! The first
atomic clocks were built by physicists. A breakthrough in chronometry
decades in the making could redefine the limits of how we keep time.
Physicists have developed functional clocks based not on the oscillations of electrons but on the back-and-forth energy shifts of atomic nuclei themselves, using thorium-229 atoms. What makes this achievement even more exciting is that it has been achieved twice, by two independent teams of scientists, in Europe and China.
Both teams have
detailed their momentous work in preprints on arXiv.
"The system
presented in this work," writes the team led by physicist Luca Toscani De
Col of the Technical University of Vienna, "constitutes the first
implementation of a nuclear clock that operates as a stand-alone device."
Atomic clocks, first
built in the 1950s, can keep time with such precision that not a single second
would be lost over billions of years.
They keep time based
on the precise 'ticking' of electrons as they switch between energy states when
stimulated by a laser.
A nuclear clock,
first proposed in 2003, would track changes in energy within the nucleus to
measure time. Achieving this has proved far more difficult because nuclear
transitions typically require much higher energies than electron transitions,
placing them beyond the reach of most laser technologies.
But there is a very
good reason for pursuing nuclear clock technology.
Electrons occupy the outer regions of an atom, which makes them – and atomic clocks – more vulnerable to influences from their surroundings.
In contrast, the
nucleus, which is concealed deep within the atom's core, is significantly less
susceptible to interference from outside sources. In theory, that could make
nuclear clocks even more stable than today's atomic clocks, while also turning
them into powerful tools for probing phenomena such as dark matter and possible
changes in the fundamental constants of nature.
Thorium-229, as laid
out in that 2003 paper, is such an excellent target for this technology because
it has an exceptionally low-energy transition state, bringing it within reach
of precision laser spectroscopy.
In 2024, researchers
in Austria and Germany made multiple breakthroughs, triggering the energy
transition in thorium-229, then getting it to 'tick'.
The next step was to
develop that ticking into an actual clock that could keep time.
And this is what the
two research teams have done.
The researchers
compared their clock against an established ytterbium-ion atomic clock,
demonstrating long-term operation and stability.
They also used the
clock to search for signs of hypothetical ultralight dark matter, setting new
constraints on several proposed models.
"These
constraints compete with the best atomic clocks regarding dark matter coupling
to photons and go beyond previous measurements regarding coupling to the strong
force and quarks," they write in their paper, "Drawing benefit from
the enhanced sensitivity of the thorium-229 transition." Meanwhile, the
Chinese team, led by physicist Beichen Huang of Tsinghua University, had a
slightly different focus.
In order to determine
if the clock's ticking was consistent, they put it through its paces using two
crystals made by different companies. A major obstacle for solid-state nuclear
clocks was solved when their clocks produced frequencies that were nearly identical.
If the crystal environment altered the nuclear frequency unpredictably, each
device would require its own calibration.
Instead, the close
agreement suggests nuclear clocks could eventually become reproducible
standards rather than one-off laboratory demonstrations.
Related: We Have a
New Record For The Most Accurate Clock Ever Built
"By making a
laser-addressed atomic nucleus an operational clock reference," the
Chinese team writes, "this work extends quantum metrology from electronic
to nuclear transitions, and opens a new platform for compact clocks,
solid-state nuclear quantum sensors, and precision tests of fundamental
physics."
The new devices do
not yet outperform the best atomic clocks – which, let's be honest, have a
70-year headstart – but they do show that nuclear clocks are not just a
theoretical dream.
In the real world,
they can and do work. And if Technical University of Vienna physicist Thorsten
Schumm's 2024 prediction proves correct, they may even outstrip today's best
atomic clocks within just a few years.
Writer: Binod Kumar
Simkhada
Binodkumarsimkhada315@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment